SSLC Maths Half yearly Tamil medium original question paper and answer key prepared by Mrs.S.Seethalakshmi, Kanchipuram
Zeal study shares you Maths exam original question papers and answer keys which is prepared by Mrs.S.Seethalakshmi, Bt.Asst, Maths SSKV.School, Kanchipuram.We convey our special thanks to her for this dedicated work for us.
Evaluation is a systematic determination of a subject's merit, worth and significance, using criteria governed by a set of standards. It can assist an organization, program, design, project or any other intervention or initiative to assess any aim, realisable concept/proposal, or any alternative, to help in decision-making; or to ascertain the degree of achievement or value in regard to the aim and objectives and results of any such action that has been completed.[1] The primary purpose of evaluation, in addition to gaining insight into prior or existing initiatives, is to enable reflection and assist in the identification of future change.
[2]Evaluation is the structured interpretation and giving of meaning to predicted or actual impacts of proposals or results. It looks at original objectives, and at what is either predicted or what was accomplished and how it was accomplished. So evaluation can be formative, that is taking place during the development of a concept or proposal, project or organization, with the intention of improving the value or effectiveness of the proposal, project, or organisation. It can also be summative, drawing lessons from a completed action or project or an organisation at a later point in time or circumstance.[3]
Evaluation is inherently a theoretically informed approach (whether explicitly or not), and consequently any particular definition of evaluation would have been tailored to its context – the theory, needs, purpose, and methodology of the evaluation process itself. Having said this, evaluation has been defined as:
A systematic, rigorous, and meticulous application of scientific methods to assess the design, implementation, improvement, or outcomes of a program. It is a resource-intensive process, frequently requiring resources, such as, evaluate expertise, labor, time, and a sizable budget[4]
"The critical assessment, in as objective a manner as possible, of the degree to which a service or its component parts fulfills stated goals" (St Leger and Wordsworth-Bell).[5][failed verification] The focus of this definition is on attaining objective knowledge, and scientifically or quantitatively measuring predetermined and external concepts.
"A study designed to assist some audience to assess an object's merit and worth" (Stufflebeam).[5][failed verification] In this definition the focus is on facts as well as value laden judgments of the programs outcomes and worth.
Evaluation is often used to characterize and appraise subjects of interest in a wide range of human enterprises, including the arts, criminal justice, foundations, non-profit organizations, government, health care, and other human services. It is long term and done at the end of a period of time.
The efficient and smooth conduct of examinations and timely declaration of the results can be ensured only with the cooperation of all the stake holders including teaching, non-teaching and administrative staff of the Institute. They are expected to be aware of the various procedures and time schedules which they should adhere to. Invigilators are requested to acquaint with the following procedures: 1) Carrying mobile phones or any reading material by the invigilator is strictly prohibited. The invigilator is expected to be vigilant and take frequent rounds in the exam hall. The invigilators should not chit chat with each other as it will distract the students concentration in writing the Examination. 2) Invigilators shall make announcement in the Examination hall that the use of electronic devices by the students shall not be permitted in the Examination hall. In this context, electronic devices include and are not limited to mobile phones, tablet devices, laptops, data storage watches (‘smart-watches’) with means for inputting or storing information and or capable of transmitting or receiving information. 3) The invigilator is expected to be tactful while dealing with complex situations and not to disturb the tranquillity in the exam hall. In case of any problem he/she may bring the matter to the notice of the Controller of Examinations (CE). 4) Disclose to the Controller of Examinations, well in advance, any conflicts of interest (e.g. immediate family member/close relative is a candidate for the exam) in doing a particular examination duty.. This is essential to maintain transparency in Examination system and avoid unnecessary complications/allegations and litigation following the Examination. 5) Only teaching staff are to be drafted as invigilators. Subject teachers should not be posted as invigilators in the examination halls where the students are writing/ write the examination in that subject.
